The Deep Ecclesiology of the Body

by Frank Viola
My friends Andrew Jones and Brian McLaren have written about something they call “deep ecclesiology.” This phrase appears to be derived from Noam Chomsky’s linguistic theory of “deep semantics.” Chomsky said that underlying the “surface structures” of the statements we make there lies a deeper and simpler structure that is ingrained in the human capacity for language.
Andrew and Brian have said that in a similar way there lies underneath our varying models of church a basic underlying reality that is manifested in our historical and social settings. This notion has been coined “deep ecclesiology.”
I resonate wholeheartedly with the concept that there is a reality of the church that is higher and deeper than what typically occurs in many modern church structures. To wit, a “deeper” ecclesiology.
At the time of this writing, the phrase “deep ecclesiology” is still being shaped. I have shared my thoughts on this subject with both Brian and Andrew, along with some others in the emerging church conversation.
So this article can be considered a stab at furthering that shaping in the public arena. I strongly believe that the underlying reality of the church is none other than Jesus Christ Himself. Not as a doctrine. Nor as a system of belief. Nor as a set of moral teachings. But as a living Person who has thoughts, feelings, and volition. A living Person who dwells within our spirits and who can be known. To my mind, any ecclesiology that does not make Christ absolutely central in its life, mission, and expression cannot be rightly called “deep.”
The church is the indwelling of Christ in a group of localized people by the Holy Spirit. Those models and forms of church which best enact this reality, giving it visible expression, are adequate toward fulfilling a deep ecclesiology. Those models and forms which do not, should be discarded for those which better enact it.
In this article, I shall attempt to explain how I arrived at this conclusion and what it means (at least for me) in concrete terms. I could have easily subtitled this chapter One Man’s Journey Into a Deep Ecclesiology.
Shortly after I began following the Lord at age sixteen, I was introduced to something called “revivalist theology.” If you are an evangelical Christian, then you may be familiar with this theology. Revivalist theology was founded during the days of the English revivalist George Whitefield. It was later picked up and popularized by Dwight L. Moody.
D.L. Moody was an American revivalist who lived in the 19th century. Historians estimate that Moody preached the gospel to 100 million people in his lifetime. Moody did not have televisions, the Internet, radios, cable TV, fax machines, mp3 players, email, nor did he put out a national magazine. He did most of his preaching on foot and preached in the open air. It has been said that Moody brought one million people to Christ.
During the years of 1870 to 1900, revivalist theology was born. And it largely came through the womb of D.L. Moody’s ministry. What is revivalist theology? Revivalist theology hangs on two unshakable precepts: 1) If you are lost, you must be saved. 2) If you are saved, you must win the lost. According to revivalist theology, every word in the Bible—both Old and New Testaments—hangs on these two precepts. Everything in the Bible can be juiced down to those two things.
To unravel it further, revivalist theology teaches that the only reason why you are alive today is so that you can get other people’s papers in order for heaven. In fact, that is the only reason why God didn’t strike you deader-than-a-hammer after you became a Christian.
Because I had never been taught anything else, I embraced this theology hook, line, and sinker. I later came to realize that revivalist theology is untenable. It dutifully ignores 99.7% of the Bible. (I can only think of two occasions in the New Testament where Christians who were not apostles preached the gospel to the lost. Additionally, I cannot think of any verse in any letter in the New Testament penned by Paul, Peter, John, James or Jude where Christians are exhorted to preach the gospel to the lost.)
Am I against revival? No. Am I against sharing the gospel with the lost? Not at all. What I am against is the tendency to take the New Testament and stretch it to the point where it fits revivalist theology. The vast bulk of the New Testament is not about winning the lost.
After I was thoroughly schooled in revivalist theology (this included knocking on doors, “Four-Lawing” strangers, and taking sinners down “the Romans road”), I was introduced to “the power of God.” I drank deeply from the wells of a movement that obsessed over God’s power. I heard sermon after sermon on the gifts of the Spirit, the recovery of the gifts, miracles, healings, signs and wonders. I also had my share of experiences with God’s power.
Today, I am a firm believer that the power of God is real and operative in our time. However, when I stood back from that season in my life, I made a few telling observations. First, most of the people that I ran around with who incessantly talked about “the power of God” were the same people who were most lacking in God’s power! I saw this countless times. So much so that it became a predictable pattern.
Second, I met a few King Sauls, a few Balaams, and a few Samsons in this camp. Explanation: These three men had tremendous outward power. King Saul prophesied accurately, Balaam had an incredible gift of the word of knowledge and the word of wisdom, and Samson was unstoppable in his display of physical strength.
But there was one other thing that these three men shared. They all had defective characters in some arena of their lives. And their flesh was very much alive in those arenas. Outwardly, they had impressive gifts of spiritual power. But inwardly, they lacked something fundamental.
For me, this has been one of the greatest imponderables of being a Christian. I have personally known Christian leaders who had incredible giftings—gifts of healing, word of knowledge, spiritual understanding and insight, and the ability to preach and write with great anointing. Some of these men had a very strong devotional life and set themselves up as leaders in this area.
Yet . . . as dismaying as it sounds . . . these same men didn’t have the most basic grasp of Christ in the most basic areas of the Christian life. They had profound human foibles that never traveled to the cross. The tragedy is that such men drew followings with their powerful gifts. Yet subtly, their uncrucified flesh always ended up damaging their work and causing incalculable harm to many innocent souls.
Perhaps the reason for this paradox is found in Paul’s words: “For God’s gifts and His call are irrevocable” (Rom. 11:29). A gift is something that is freely given. It’s unmerited and unearned. Once granted, it cannot be removed. A gift, then, is no measure of spirituality or character development. Neither is it an evidence of God’s approval nor a sign of God’s favor. It’s simply a spiritual or supernatural ability given freely and irrevocably by God’s grace (Eph. 4:8-11; Rom. 12:6-8). This makes spiritual gifting a very dangerous thing. For if the vessel is not broken, or it goes off the rails later in life, the gifting becomes a liability.
The power of God that is wielded by an unbroken vessel is a very hazardous thing indeed. A destructive thing even. Not a few men have used the holy things of God for their own ends. And the result was disaster.
In one of his letters, Paul carries on rather loudly about the peril of possessing gifts of great spiritual power—including spiritual insight into the deep mysteries of God—and yet lacking some of the basic features of love, like honesty, humility, and kindness (see 1 Cor. 13:1-3). Character, therefore, and not gifting, is the only reliable sign of God’s work in a person’s life (Matt. 7:22-23).
I made another puzzling observation on this score. I noticed that so many of my fellow brethren who talked about the power of God seemed to be self-absorbed. They had an uncommon knack for talking about themselves and how God was using them with His power. Whenever they would testify, 10% of it seemed to be about what God was doing. The other 90% was how God was using them and what they were doing.
Paul of Tarsus, a man who had tremendous spiritual gifts, hardly uttered a whisper about how God used him. And the one time that he described his spiritual experiences, he was backed into a corner to testify about them. In so doing, he did two notable things. One, he used the third person to describe his revelation of the Lord. Two, he said he was speaking as a fool in detailing God’s power in his life (see 2 Corinthians 12:1ff.).
To put a finer point on it, I learned that those who have genuine power with God do not talk much about it. And they certainly don’t talk about themselves a whole lot either. I learned that it’s profoundly easy to become drunk on God’s power . . . to become obsessed with the miraculous . . . to become fixated with spiritual gifting . . . and lose sight of Jesus Christ.
It’s a perilous thing when men try to harness God. I’m a firm believer that the church of Jesus Christ has been granted enormous spiritual power. But that power is upon the church, not a set of special individuals. (We Protestants have rarely been given a corporate understanding of the Holy Spirit.) I have sadly watched the power of God be reduced to something quite common and cheap. The result: The power becomes diluted. Within the confines of the Body of Christ, the power of God is safe. That’s because the church is the steward of God’s power. Outside of her, it becomes easily corrupted.
Am I against the power of God? Not at all. I appreciate the power of God. I even awe at it. But I am against putting power on the throne. For that reason, I cast a cautious eye upon those who claim to have God’s power.
The power of God is Jesus Christ (1 Cor. 1:24). And the Holy Spirit has come to reveal, honor, and glorify Him (John 15:26; 16:13-14). It’s a fitting irony, therefore, that one of the things which will derail you and me from encountering what the Holy Spirit came to do is to seek the power of God! To put it in prescription form: Seek the power of God, and you will undoubtedly miss Christ who embodies that power.
After that season in my life, I was sold a different bag of Christian goods. I ended up on the eschatology train. Eschatology is the study of things to come . . . the study of end times. When is Jesus Christ going to return? When is Russia going to invade Jerusalem? What is the meaning of the ninth toe on the foot of the beast in the book of Revelation? When does Daniel’s “70 weeks” begin? Who is the false prophet? And of course, who is the antichrist and exactly what is the mark of the beast!?
Open admission: I caught eschatology fever. I was bitten by the rapture bug. I began studying the visions of Daniel and Revelation, making charts, plotting graphs, mapping out the movements of the antichrist, the false prophet, God and Magog, etc.
Attention young Christians: You can get ridiculously obsessed with rapture fever! I was taught, “This is important. We have to know prophecy. We must study prophecy. 90% of the Bible is prophecy. We have a duty to understand it.” Let me confess. I was pathetically into eschatology. So much so that I could discuss it for hours with wild-eyed fascination.
But I made a discovery. That all of those hours I spent pouring over Daniel, Ezekiel, and Revelation . . . trying to put the end-time puzzle together . . . did not help me one iota to come to know my Lord better. It was largely an academic, intellectual exercise. And a sterile one at that!
The result: I stopped studying end-time prophecy.
After I got off the eschatology bandwagon, I was introduced to something called “Christian theology” and “Christian doctrine.” I was taught that the most important thing that God wants for His people is that they know and embrace “sound doctrine.” So I rigorously studied the Scriptures, along with the views of Calvin, Arminius, Luther, and many contemporary theologians and scholars.
In my early 20s, I was attending various Bible studies—each sponsored by different denominations and movements. There I would engage in the usual shrill disputes over doctrine with my Christian brothers. I will shamelessly admit that I enjoyed the mental stimulation of sharpening my doctrinal sword on the side of someone else’s head!
But during that season, I made another discovery. Namely, that Christian doctrine can make a person downright mean! I observed that the men who were the most schooled in Christian doctrine and the most concerned about “sound theology” did not resemble Jesus Christ at all in their behavior. Instead, they seemed to center their lives on making the unimportant critical. The spirit of the Lamb was altogether missing. They were harsh personalities who appeared to almost hate those with whom they disagreed. Granted, there is a doctrine in the New Testament. But majoring on Christian doctrine and theology can turn Christians into inquisitors.
Am I against doctrine? No sir. Am I against theology? No ma’am. But I do not advocate an overemphasis on it. Consequently, I came to the place where I was compelled to lay down my doctrinal sword, for like Peter, I had been cutting people’s ears off with it!
I recommend that you study church history. It will make you cry. Our forefathers drew their swords against one another, spilling their blood over doctrines. Peripheral doctrines at that! They crossed swords over their private interpretations of Scripture, and it often ended in bloodshed. Again, majoring in doctrine can make a Christian vicious. History bears this out.
After I dropped pursuing doctrine and theology, I became involved in a lot of other Christian “things.” I majored in holiness, believing that it was the central theme of the Bible. I then majored in faith and learned the principles of “walking in” and “living by” faith. I became deeply involved in “worship and praise”—deeming both to be the central desire of God. Then it was ministry to the poor. Then personal prophecy.
After that it was Christian apologetics. My venture into apologetics led me to debate with the president of the American Atheist Association in the city where I lived. I was 23 years old at the time. I studied the apparent contradictions of the Bible and resolved many of them. (Today, I am perfectly content to leave them unresolved!) While it was great fun watching my atheist opponent squirm, the thrill soon wore off. While he didn’t convert to Christ, he had to rethink his understanding of what a Christian was. Even so, I suspect there was little eternal value that came of it.
Enough of the historical narrative. Here is my point. In the first eight years of my Christian experience, I learned to major in a slew of “Christian things.” And that is my point . . . they were things!
All of the churches and movements I was involved in had effectively preached to me an it. Evangelism is an it. The power of God is an it. Eschatology is an it. Christian theology is an it. Christian doctrine is an it. Faith is an it. Apologetics is an it.
I made the striking discovery that I don’t need an it. I have never needed an it. And I will never need an it. Christian it’s . . . no matter how good or true . . . eventually wear out, run dry, and become tiresome.
I don’t need an it . . . I need a Him!
And so do you!
We do not need things. We need Jesus Christ!
Everything in Scripture . . . every book, every story, every teaching, every theme, every letter, every verse . . . all of the arrows point to Him!
You search the Scriptures because you think they give you eternal life. But the Scriptures point to me! (John 5:39, NLT)
And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself . . . Then their eyes were opened and they recognized him. (Luke 24:27, 31)
He said to them, “This is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms.” Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures. (Luke 24:44-45)
To be truly Scriptural is to be Christological, for Jesus Christ is the subject of all Scripture. This discovery changed my life.
My journey didn’t end there, however. Around the same time, I made another life-altering discovery. It was this: That Jesus Christ is the embodiment of all Divine things. My eyes were opened to see that Jesus Christ is Salvation. Jesus Christ is the Power of God. Jesus Christ is Holiness. Jesus Christ is Doctrine. Jesus Christ is the living incarnation of everything that is spiritual!
You can chase things until you are blue in the face. And there will always be some Christian who is peddling a new it or a thing upon which to center your life. Warning: If you buy into it, you will most certainly miss Him.
When I realized that Christ was everything in the Christian life and that the Father had put all spiritual things into Him, it radically changed my life. Gone were the days where I sought “things.” Gone were the days where I chased after Christian truths, doctrines, and theologies. A new chapter had opened where I began to seek Christ Himself. I sought to be drowned in the face of the knowledge of my Lord. For I discovered that in Him exists everything that I needed.
God’s object from first to last is His Son. It is Christ—and Christ alone—that God the Father desires for His people. I had grossly confused spiritual growth with acquiring spiritual things. So I went about pursuing spiritual knowledge, spiritual virtues, spiritual graces, spiritual gifts and spiritual power. I later discovered that spiritual growth is nothing more than having Christ formed within (Gal. 4:19). When we are saved, Jesus Christ is begotten in us. He then grows in us. Spiritual growth, then, is nothing more than knowing Him and allowing Him to grow in us.
Upon reflection, it seems that many Christians regard salvation, evangelism, peace, power, holiness, joy, service, church practice, ministry, and doctrine as simply Divine “things”—all detached from the living Person of Christ and made something in and of themselves.
But God never gives us spiritual things. He never gives us virtues, gifts, graces, and truths to acquire. Instead, He only gives us His Son. He gives us Christ to be all things for us.
Consequently, Jesus Christ is the embodiment of all spiritual things. He is the substance of all Divine realities. He is the incarnation of all spiritual virtues, graces, gifts, and truths. In short, God has vested all of His fullness into His Son.
In other words, Jesus Christ not only reveals the way to His people, He is the Way. Jesus Christ not only reveals the truth to His people, He is the Truth. Jesus Christ is not only the giver of life, He is the Life (John 14:6). Put another way, Christ is the embodiment of all that He gives! He is All and All. That is, He is everything to everyone who has received His life.
Jesus Christ is Hope (1 Tim. 1:1).
Jesus Christ is Peace (Eph. 2:14).
Jesus Christ is Wisdom (1 Cor. 1:30).
Jesus Christ is Redemption (1 Cor. 1:30).
Jesus Christ is Holiness (1 Cor. 1:30).
Jesus Christ is Righteousness (1 Cor. 1:30).
Hope is not a thing to be sought after, it is a Person. Peace is not a virtue to be obtained, it is Christ. Righteousness is not a grace to be asked for, it is Christ, and on and on. One is a spiritual “thing.” The other is the Lord Himself. To put it in a sentence, Jesus Christ is not simply the giver of gifts, He Himself is the Gift!
Spiritual progress, therefore, is tied up in knowing Christ as our All. Spiritual growth takes place when we take Christ as our Portion to be all things for us. Greater Bible knowledge will not do this for you. Increased religious activity or spiritual service will not do this for you. Neither will spending more time praying. Only a revelation of the vastness of Christ can meet the bill.
As I survey the landscape of modern Christianity, it seems to me that spiritual things and objects have replaced the Person of Christ. The doctrines, gifts, graces, and virtues that we so earnestly seek have substituted for Jesus Himself. We look to this gift and that gift . . . we study this truth and that truth . . . we seek to appropriate this virtue and that virtue, but all along we fail to find Him.
When the Father gives us something, it’s always His Son. When the Son gives us something, it’s always Himself. This insight greatly simplifies the Christian life. Instead of seeking many spiritual things, we only seek Him. Our single occupation is the Lord Jesus Christ. He becomes our only pursuit. We do not seek Divine things, we seek a Divine Person. We do not seek gifts, we seek the giver who embodies all the gifts. We do not seek truth, we seek the incarnation of all truth.
God has given us all spiritual things in His Son. He has made Him to be our wisdom, our righteousness, our sanctification, our redemption, our peace, our hope, etc. Recognizing that Jesus Christ is the incarnation of all spiritual things will change your prayer life. It will change your vocabulary and the way you think and talk about spiritual things. And it will ultimately change your practice of the church.
To put it candidly, you will never have an authentic experience of the Body of Christ unless your foundation is blindly and singularly Jesus Christ. Church life is born when a group of people are intoxicated with a glorious unveiling of their Lord. The chief task of a Christian leader, therefore, is to present a Christ to God’s people that they have never known, dreamed, or imagined. A breathtaking Christ whom they can know intimately and love passionately. The calling of every Christian servant is to build the ekklesia upon an overmastering revelation of the Son of God. A revelation that burns in the fiber of their being and leaves God’s people breathless, overwhelmed, and awash in the glories of Jesus.
From God’s standpoint, the church’s center of gravity is Jesus Christ. When a church is centered on the ultimacy of Christ, it no longer chases Christian things or its. Knowing Christ, exploring Him, encountering Him, honoring Him, and loving Him becomes the church’s governing pursuit. Rightly conceived, the church is a group of people who have been immersed and saturated with a magnificent vision of Jesus Christ and who are discovering how to take Him as their All together. This discovery lies at the heart of a deep ecclesiology.
I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ . . . That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings . . . (Philippians 3:8, 10, KJV)
To summarize, before we can understand what the church does, we must first understand what the church is. We must unearth the ontology—or the essence—of the church.
According to Scripture, the church is not a human creation. Instead, it existed before creation (in Christ) and before culture began. God created the universe for the church and not the other way around. To put it another way, God created the universe so that He might have a Bride, a Body, a House, and a Family. This is the metanarrative that permeates the entire Bible.
Consequently, the church was not an afterthought nor a means to an end. The church is the end! God’s ultimate purpose is to transform the world into the church—which is Jesus Christ in corporate human expression. This does not suggest that the church should not find ways to contextualize the gospel to the present culture. It should. But it should not ape the culture and violate its DNA in the process.
A deep ecclesiology, then, honors all Christians regardless of their religious pedigree. It esteems all Christians wherever they are on the basis that they are membered to Jesus Christ. Those models of church which make Jesus Christ central in its life, its mission, and its expression are faithful to a deep ecclesiology. Those models which clash with the church’s DNA—which is Christ—are incompatible with a deep ecclesiology.
I shall close with the words of A.B. Simpson, which are fitting:
Once it was the blessing, Now it is the Lord;
Once it was the feeling, Now it is His Word.
Once His gifts I wanted, Now the Giver own;
Once I sought for healing, Now Himself alone.
Once ‘twas painful trying, Now ‘tis perfect trust;
Once a half salvation, Now the uttermost.
Once ‘twas ceaseless holding, Now He holds me fast;
Once ‘twas constant drifting, Now my anchor’s cast.
Once ‘twas busy planning, Now ‘tis trustful prayer;
Once ‘twas anxious caring, Now He has the care.
Once ‘twas what I wanted, Now what Jesus says;
Once ‘twas constant asking, Now ‘tis ceaseless praise.
Once it was my working, His it hence shall be;
Once I tried to use Him, Now He uses me.
Once the power I wanted, Now the Mighty One;
Once for self I labored, Now for Him alone
Once I hoped in Jesus, Now I know He’s mine;
Once my lamps were dying, Now they brightly shine.
Once for death I waited, Now His coming hail;
And my hopes are anchored, Safe within the vail.
This article has been excerpted from the author’s new book God’s Ultimate Passion: Unveiling the Purpose Behind Everything.
FRANK VIOLA's website is www.ptmin.org


January 27th, 2007 at 4:46 pm
Hi,
A very well presented life experience and exhortation toward Christ. I agree!!! The greatest commandment Jesus said was to love God with everything, and loving others. As soon as an individual or movement shifts it’s emphasis from loving Jesus more, to any other worthy or noble biblical or gospel concept, we are in danger. All our experience is necessary but with reflection, we should take the best and reject what is unhelpful and seek Jesus more.
Not sure i like that picture though!!
Thanks,
Jeff
January 30th, 2007 at 5:58 pm
A good read, which I endorse thoroughly.
Get away from Theology and get into Kneeology.
i.e. get on your knees and develop a close relationship with our saviour through prayer.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:05 pm
Franky’s on fire! Luvin’ it!
I’ve started running off some copies of this article for some mates who’ve been stuck in Revivalist Theology land…(problem with all the “found” ones is they’re so flippin’ lost!)
Franky’s articles are so good he should start workin’ on his titles!…dunno if I’ll ever tell anyone to ‘ Deepen their Ecclesiology ‘, but what a great testimony for those who get stuck seeking the ‘things’ of God and not the ‘face’ of God.
Peace n’ goodwill to all men!
November 3rd, 2007 at 1:59 pm
Since when is Christianity theoogy indebt to Norm Chomsky for its ontology of the church. Here is yet another reactionary attempt by a frustrated evangelical to define the church in terms of a non-theological catch-word, in this case, “deep” as introduced by none other than Chomsky. When are Christian pundits like Frank Viola going to get it and look at the 200o years of church history, the church fathers and mothers,
God forbid, maybe even Scripture itself to graps an ontology of the church which is Christian, not “deep”
“contemporary” “traditional” “pentecostal” or even “purpose-driven.” Evangelicals who are spinning off the dying treadmill of this misguided movement which has never possessed an ecclesiology, now has bubble kids like MacClaren and Viola writing about the church from scant knowledge of history, tradition or theology. When will the published pundits on ecclesiology finally get a theology of the church which is not indebted to catch-phrases, secular philosophers or market-driven capitalism?