Signs of the Pseudo Apostolic
by Brett Jacobsen
Historically, there usually seems to be a counterfeit before, after and during real moves of God. The current reformation and the restoration of the true apostolic are in no way exempt from histories repetitious woes.
In this modern Christian setting we need to be on guard against things which pretend to be something biblically genuine, but are in fact not. It is perhaps more crucial in this season where God is re forming the structures of leadership and church. Many men and movements profess reformation. In reality they are clinging to the old ways of carnal Christendom and dressing them up with new lingo, programmes and positions.
Below are six [1] main areas where I see the pseudo (fake) apostolic showing its true extra-biblical colours:
1. So-called Apostles who are over not under the body – There are many ministries (for lack of a better term) today who have a head Apostle over them. These claim revolutionary status due to being daring enough to recognise modern day apostles. However these systems are more ‘revolting to the Lord’ than ‘revolutionary for Him’. They’ve done nothing more than continue the horrendous hierarchical, clergy/laity system inherited from the Dark Ages and added another Pope to the pile, presiding over God’s people.
Consider the following scriptures in relation to these Head Apostles:
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; (1 Tim 2:5)
But be not you called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all you are brethren. 9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. 10 Neither be you called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ. 11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant. 12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted. (Matt 23:8-12)
So all of us are brothers, we all have but one master (Jesus), there ought to be no-one between us and God (except Jesus) and biblical leaders (apostles included) are servants to Jesus’ sheep.
Also, apostles (and prophets) are foundation ministries:
According to the grace of God which is given to me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another builds thereon. But let every man take heed how he builds thereupon. 11 For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ. (1 Cor 3:10-11)
…the household of God; 20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; 21 In whom all the building fitly framed together grows unto an holy temple in the Lord: (Eph 2:19-21)
Foundations are at the bottom of a building, mostly beneath the ground, they are never at the top. These Head Apostles who head up organisations, denominations and “churches” are in breach of their role definitions. The same goes for other head positions like Senior Pastor. Not only do they plant “churches” rather than plant Christ’s Kingdom (which produces spiritually connected communities), they linger past the foundational stages and gravitate to, or remain at, the top of the pile.
A true apostle will lay Christ as the foundation beneath people and communities. This he will do for a season. He will then pull back and allow everyone else to build thereon. Although he will have true heavenly authority in his life, he will not be head over anyone nor mediator between God and men, he will simply serve. A true apostle will cause himself to be obscured by the rest of the body, laying himself down as an example of Christ to see the Kingdom manifest in the body.
(Beneath this article are the links to chapter six of Heaven’s Underground Blueprint in which I present a clearer biblical picture of New Testament leadership, including that of apostles.)
2. Owners of people and organisations – Another sign of the not so genuine apostles in our time is that they love to have their stamp of ownership on THEIR work. This stems from insecurity, fleshly striving and pride, among other symptoms of spiritual sickness [2].
Carnal men love to get the kudos for what they have built. One sure way for wayward Apostles to appease this debased desire is to stamp a name on a group of people- denominating in some manner [3]. This causes the people who identify with that named organization to have their identity in it, not just in the Lord.
Another way this false ownership of God’s sheep manifests is through the sheep themselves when they say things like “I go to so-n-so’s church” or “I’m under such-n-such Apostle”.
The fact is that Jesus is the only good shepherd, the only one who owns any sheep. John’s gospel provides all the clarity we need for the subject:
I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd gives his life for the sheep. 12 But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, sees the wolf coming, and leaves the sheep, and flees: and the wolf catches them, and scatters the sheep. 13 The hireling flees, because he is an hireling, and cares not for the sheep. 14 I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. (John 10:11-14)
This passage has been ab-used too often to tell positioned Pastors to be good shepherds rather than crook hirelings. That teaching is full of error.
Jesus is the only shepherd mentioned in the passage. Every other leader/minister in His Kingdom sheepfold is a hireling: one employed [4] to work amongst HIS sheep. Reading this in its true context reveals that the “hireling” that Jesus was specifically referring to was the leaders of Israel at that point in history, they were bad hirelings. However, we can be good hirelings, but when all is said and done we are all His sheep, owned by Him alone.
3. Sole operators (who may join token coalitions) – Many modern “Apostles” operate more like travelling salesmen and business C.E.O's than Kingdom equippers.
It is scarce to see true apostles working as a team with other apostles and believers amongst what is clearly portrayed as God’s flock.
Mostly we see Apostles who have ‘their’ people and other Apostles who have ‘their’ people. Some form networks or coalitions and work together to a degree as they help each other with each others’ sheep. This is still a far cry from a biblical picture of apostolic ministry.
Here are a few key factors to biblical apostles working together:
- They should mostly work “in pairs” or in larger groups rather than as dissociate one man bands (Luke 10:1 NASB).
- The people/sheep who are in any of the areas that the apostles work are the Lord’s only, they don’t belong to a specific apostle even though they may be his “work in the Lord” (1 Cor 9:1). This way other apostles (and other equippers) are free to come alongside the work as the Spirit leads and builds the church.
- They each ought to be about building the Kingdom of God (which “comes not with observation” Luke 17:20) rather than something more publicly evident.
- They should be sent out by the Holy Spirit from the local ecclesia instead of drifting from stage to stage, meeting to meeting as they or their itinerary decides… or popularity.
- They ought to be financially supported by and in relational accountability to their local ecclesia rather than going from love offering to honorarium to conference payment. When true apostles are moderately supported by the local believers, they can wholly focus on the building of His Kingdom where, when and how He wishes. [5]
These and other keys will save many future apostles from being swallowed up by the ministry monster which seeks to devour all who stand up to be used as a servant to His body.
4. Stage strutters rather than life examples – Sadly, the church didn’t take very long to move out of every day life into special holy buildings with performance platforms. A mixture of Old Testament and Pagan practices as well as Greek philosophy and ideals created the prancing podiums which modern ministries continue to occupy.
Church ministry has largely become a ‘scene of men’ where Christian communicators are “seen of men” as they perform spiritual activities before the passive pew sitting pack (Matt 6:1-6). This ought not be so.
The main function of any leader, apostles or other, is to be an example to the flock:
Paul-
…to make ourselves an example [tupos] to you (2 Thess 3:9)
…you have us for an example [tupos]. (Phil 3:17)
Peter-
“The elders” […] “among you” […] “being examples [tupos] to the flock” (1 Pet 5:1-3)
Tupos – an example; a stamp; a shape; style or resemblance; a sampler; a model; a pattern.
Jesus-
For I have given you an example [hupodeigma], that you should do as I have done to you. (John 13:15)
Hupodeigma – an example; an exhibit for imitation or warning; pattern.
For even hereto were you called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example [hupogrammos], that you should follow his steps: (1 Pet 2:21)
If you are going to train someone to play soccer you should go with them onto a soccer field and teach them while playing and practicing with them. If leaders (apostles included) are going to equip and train Christians in Kingdom life then the best method is to play and practice Kingdom life with them. Trading in your pulpit for a couch and/or cafe and your cathedral for a living room is not only a biblically sound move; it’s a pragmatically effective one.
Of course there is a time and a place for a larger crowd of Christians to gather and even for an equipper to teach with only a small amount of input from others. This however, should not be normative… and it’s not what church really is.
5. Church hiders and cathedral evangelisers – It was the apostles who Jesus commanded to “go you into all the world, and preach the gospel…” (Mark 16:15). The larger population of believers in an area are to manifest the Kingdom of Christ as they live in Christ-centred community. The apostles and prophets (sometimes with others in a team) are to be sent out by the local ecclesia to plant the Kingdom seed of Christ.
Most apostles are geographical apostles who are graced and called to take the gospel of the Kingdom and plant it in a new area. There are also more reformation type apostles who are to re-lay a truer foundation of Christ throughout the church. These will be clearly manifest as ones who are called to bring about change (re form) to the body.
Many who have been titled Apostles in our modern era go from “church” to “church” doing ministry. They, along with other leaders and believers expect the world to come to their meeting to find God. Remember, Jesus said “go”. [6]
Also, many of these “Apostles” have their church movements which grow by taking other “churches” under their “covering” and the “churches” grow largely by transfer growth from other “churches”. It’s all a bit too insular, divided and competitive isn’t it?
Apostles are the first examples to the believers and therefore it is crucial that they model ministry which is out there in everyday life. The true modern day apostles should for the most part be out there doing much of their ministry with the not yet and just saved people- laying Christ beneath them by Word and example in everyday life.
6. Man praising rather than valuing elders – Due to many pieces of the modern apostolic puzzle being out of place we have a leadership in the church which leans heavily on carnality and therefore produces all sorts of carnal fruit.
One of the results of this is men honouring men in a way that they should not. Yes we ought to “honour [time]” the elders who “labour in the word and doctrine” (1 Tim 5:17). This honour is very different from what we see in “ministries” these days. Paul used the word “time” which means to value (especially financially) the elders which Peter said were “among” the saints (1 Pet 5:1).
We are taught that we should value (including financially) the work of equipping elders who work amongst us… we are not to honour/praise/revere them though. What many modern leaders have promoted and taught the saints to give them is more like doxa honour. Let’s see what Jesus spoke about to the Jewish leaders concerning giving men doxa:
I receive not honour [doxa- glory, dignity, praise] from men. 42 But I know you, that you have not the love of God in you. 43 I am come in my Father's name, and you receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him you will receive. 44 How can you believe, which receive honour [doxa] one of another, and seek not the honour [doxa] that comes from God only? (John 5:41-44)
Jesus, when He ministered on earth would not let men even give Him doxa-honour (glory, dignity, praise). He scolded Israel’s leaders because they “[received] doxa-honour one of another” and therefore had “not the love of God in [them]”. Though we may think we are honouring leaders by revering them we actually do them a great disservice, we rob them of being honoured by God alone.
This will be another characteristic of true modern apostles. Not only will they shun the limelight and laudation of fellow saints, they will operate in a biblical manner which will obscure them and reveal and glorify Christ alone.
[1] Six is the number of man and beast (both created on the sixth day) and it is fitting that there just happened to be six major areas that came to mind while I pondered the false, humanistic attempts at apostolic leadership in the modern church.
[2] Of course in some cases it is more a lack of understanding as well as inherited structures and doctrines which has them operating as an owner of Christ’s sheep.
[3] See chapter eight of Heaven’s Underground Blueprint for more points on biblical unity compared to man’s ecumenicalism, or go here: http://www.christisall.org/2006/01/25/one-body-embracing-true-biblical-unity-by-brett-jacobsen/
[4] I don’t mean that they are all financially employed, just engaged in the work.
[5] Much more discussion is needed on the subject of financing apostles and other equipping gifts but we don’t have the space here to go into depth. This is a subject which I will be addressing more thoroughly in the near future.
[6] Yes Jesus said “come unto me, all you…” but this in no way tells us we should try to get sinners to “come” to “church” (Matt 11:28). He said “come unto ME” and we all know that Jesus is “through all” rather than being tucked away in a religious edifice (Eph 4:6). We go to them so that they can come to Jesus- read Hebrews 12:22-24 to see where Jesus wants them to come.
For more reading on New Testament leadership and community as well as other reformational insights, see the author’s book Heaven’s Underground Blueprint here- http://www.christisall.org/hub-book for a copy or a free PDF version.
Chapter six of Heaven’s Underground Blueprint is a teaching on biblical leadership instead of man’s traditions. You can read the chapter called Heaven’s Underground Leadership Blueprint here:
Part 1- www.christisall.org/2006/05/10/heavens-underground-leadership-blueprint-pt-1-of-5-by-brett-jacobsen/
Part 2- www.christisall.org/2006/05/16/heavens-underground-leadership-blueprint-pt-2-of-5-by-brett-jacobsen/
Part 3- www.christisall.org/2006/05/19/heavens-underground-leadership-blueprint-pt-3-of-5-by-brett-jacobsen/
Part 4- www.christisall.org/2006/05/24/heavens-underground-leadership-blueprint-pt-4-of-5-by-brett-jacobsen/
Part 5- www.christisall.org/2006/05/27/heavens-underground-leadership-blueprint-pt-5-of-5-by-brett-jacobsen/
REPRINT AGREEMENT
Duplication and re-transmission of this writing is permitted provided that complete source and website information for CHRIST IS ALL is included.
Thank you.



September 25th, 2008 at 1:42 am
Nice reminder in outline, Brett. Many people will persist in assertion that “Paul” and other apostles were over (contra to: “under the Body of Christ”) the ekklesia that each helped to nurture. The desire of the people for a king prevails, while the people need recognize their true King: Ya’shua, Jesus who is called Christ/Messiah. May the Spirit of Christ, received by every true apostle, guard our hearts and minds.
September 25th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Thanks Marshall.
You hit the nail on the head- All to King Jesus!
November 16th, 2008 at 7:13 am
Hey Bretto,
Great article! With you all the way on every point!
I would add one more that I believe God has been speaking to my heart about, as a concern on His heart.
It is this…
It is the nature of men, and especially leaders, to turn everything God reveals into a justification to build something that begins to takes the focus off Jesus and put it on man, who feels he needs praise, recognition, and power, but doesn’t know this is at work within his heart.
As such, as we watch the Lord/Builder of His Church, re form His Church into something that more closely approaches that which is in His heart for her, we simultaneously watch men refer to it as a “Movement.” Why?
Not desiring to be mean spirited or judgmental of any particular person, I believe the reason that men begin to talk “Movement,” is because once they have defined it as a movement it stirs within them a longing to find their significance in forming that movement. They are no longer singularly interested in focusing the body of Christ on Jesus Himself, but find great satisfaction and life meaning in furthering, developing, and defining the movement and their needed role in that process.
The modern apostolic movement appears to me to be rife with this error. From its very beginning it appeared to be tainted with the finger print of man, rather than exclusively about the glory of Christ.
Has Jesus really created a movement of which He is looking for a few good men to lead it in a coalition format? Is that what the body of Christ truly needs? I’m not at all convinced. I’m observing the same telltale signs of every other manmade movement beginning to attach to many aspects of this developing movement.
Do we really need apostolic convocations? Is Jesus’ work of reforming His Church truly in need of men who will come together and strategize how they might further the move of God in the earth?
If we take Acts 15 as evidence of such an early Church pattern I think we miss the point of Acts 15. When we interface Acts 15 with Galatians 1, and Paul’s involvement in this counsel, I do not see an apostle who was seeking to solidify a movement and rally the support and coalition of apostolic leaders, as much as he was intimately aware of the dangers of the current coalition leading the Church back into legalism and violation of the grace of God among the Gentiles.
Paul does not appear to be seeking a strengthened coalition of apostles, as much as he is lobbying there for taking their collective hands off of what Jesus Himself was doing a fine job of developing. Jesus was building “His” Church, and the Jerusalem elders/apostles were threatening to dishonor their Head, the Lord Jesus, by requiring of the Gentile believers things that completely opposed the Gospel of Christ. He was going to adjust the errors of their collective belief systems, rather than develop a coalition of apostolic leaders. I don’t see him affirming the validity of their coalition, as much as challenging the outcomes of it. They were experiencing collective error rather the potential of coalesced wisdom.
I see no good in this ongoing apostolic convocation. It is one thing for brethren to share meaningful relationship with one another, as led by the Spirit, but creating apostolic summits, as though Jesus’ work could not progress without their collective agreement to work together in leading the Churches, seems arrogant on one hand and foolish on the other. If the beginning of the Church did not necessitate it, and they turned the world upside down, how can it be that it is needed now?
Men have always struggled with finding their significance in Christ alone, and tended to lean towards that which will enhance their sense of significance in developing religious organizations, denominations, and alliances. As men rise in rank among their peers, become the cutting edge voices and communicators to the masses, simultaneously they have always slipped off course and begun to more worship their own plans, the revelations they have received from Christ more than Christ Himself, and their own prominence among men.
All one needs to do, to recognize this tendency, is note the development of the institutional Church after the death of the apostles. Why do we think that going back and starting the whole error all over again is going to yield a different result this time? Isn’t 2000 years of Church history sufficient to warn us against such alliances, such coalitions, such movements? Paul did all the good he did without any alliance to the Jerusalem coalition.
God led Paul to work in relationship with Timothy, Titus, Silas, Trophimus, Epaphroditus, and others, whom Christ had created bonded relationships among. But we don’t see him seeking to create a united apostolic convocation of leaders. He did what he did out of intimate relationship, not with some strategy to form a movement. Throughout his ministry there is such a purity of disconnection from this tendency of man.
These things have always become more of a reproach to the work of God than an enhancement. I see the likelihood of this resulting from the current apostolic movement as being very high.
Sooo, I know my voice is not a popular one in this area, but long ago I gave up the idea of being popular with those who seek to develop their own kingdoms, rubber stamped with Jesus’ name. May God reveal the errant heart motivations and fleshly deceptions of His leaders lest we once again lead His bride away from intimacy with her husband.
November 19th, 2008 at 4:58 pm
Hi Tom,
I thought I did cover that briefly with statements like this-
“Carnal men love to get the kudos for what they have built. One sure way for wayward Apostles to appease this debased desire is to stamp a name on a group of people- denominating in some manner [3]. This causes the people who identify with that named organization to have their identity in it, not just in the Lord.”
Obviously you have gone into it further, well said. I also see no need for “ongoing apostolic convocations” I do however, see a need for untitled apostles (small a) to gather from time to time to seek the Lord and dialogue together to get further clarity on orthopraxical issues. I completely concur that if it even has a faint smell of movement/network/or other fancy names for denominating, then get out the holy cannon and shoot the thing.
Also, I’m in absolute agreement with your call on the ‘Apostolic (capital A) movement’. We don’t need another movement of any sort. We shouldn’t create things of this nature which inadvertently put men in a limelight and elevate them above others.
The only network I join is Jesus’ which is being led by Holy Spirit to connect with certain people/leaders for what, when and how the Lord wishes and no more.
Also, I’m endeavouring to be open to God throwing me in the midst of the odd convocation/round table (that’s the latest fancy word for it) so I can be an agent of change (I won’t hold back or compromise no matter who is in the room).
Talk soon champ,
Bretto
November 19th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
Hey Bretto,
Yes, I do think your quote addresses exactly what I’m proposing. Sorry I missed the clear connection.
This is what I so appreciate about you Brett. Your unwavering commitment to the things that keep the focus on Jesus as opposed to men creating plans that look good on the outside but over time the seeds of the plant become evident as being more about them, their thing, and their plans, than truly about Jesus.
God help all of us to somehow stay close enough to Him that we smell the flesh’s strategies before they have become full blown deceptions and the traditions of men.
I don’t know how the first apostles avoided the junk that followed after them, but their having done so encourages me that it can happen again. I’d like to think that I could die a relatively unknown person if that ended up being God’s plan for my life, rather than do anything to put the spotlight on me and thus take it off of Him.
I love the idea of solidly Spirit established relationships, and the poweful dialogue that can come of that, but anything that looks like men creating apostolic movements to help God achieve His kingdom purposes just smells wrong to me. When men who don’t even know me, send me letters inviting me to observe the development of an apostolic team something bristles in me in opposition.
I’m sorry if anything I’ve said implies knowing their motives. I just don’t want to see happen what it appears could result from such things.
Thanks for clinging to the cross…pray I join you there and not leave that place.
Tom
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:28 am
Outstanding site. You have gained a new fan. Please keep up the fabulous posts and I look forward to more of your interesting writings.
February 24th, 2010 at 11:57 am
Thanks for the encouragement Raquel, peace
June 6th, 2010 at 5:01 am
I don’t know why google sent me over to your blog but I need to say I have been overall fascinated by the comments you have together. How much effort did it take to begin to get so many to your blog? I am pretty new to this interenet thing.